Category Archives: Religion

Is religion an issue in the presidential election?

Certain people are trying to bring religion into the race to be the Republican nominee for President. Reuters reports:

Republican presidential contenders Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann refused on Sunday to wade into a controversy over a Texas pastor’s comments about rival Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith.

I love this quote from Herman Cain:

“I am not running for theologian in chief,” Cain, a former pizza executive who is rising fast in polls, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” show when asked about the views of Dallas pastor Robert Jeffress.

As for this Robert Jeffress, you have to laugh at this comment:

“Absolutely, Mormonism is a false religion,” he told Reuters. “It was invented 1800 years after the establishment of Christianity.”

Umm, Christianity came about 1300 years after Judaism. Does that automatically make Christianity a false religion? I don’t think so!

Besides, Article VI of the Constitution clearly states:

No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

So unless a candidate for office proposes establishing one religion over another, religion is not an issue. And since no candidate so far has suggested doing so, let’s drop this ridiculous idea and debate the real difficult issues in front of us.

Freedom of religion or just illiterate?

The Arizona Republic reports ‘Atheist group sues governor over prayer day‘:

Gov. Jan Brewer is being sued for issuing proclamations in support of an Arizona Day of Prayer.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in federal court, alleges that Brewer’s actions were unconstitutional because they violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from establishing a state religion. The lawsuit seeks an injunction preventing the governor from issuing similar proclamations in the future.

Excuse me?

Brewer‘s actions were unconstitutional because they violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from establishing a state religion.

For those who don’t know, Arizona’s Governor is not the United States Congress. So there is no way she can be violating the First Amendment, which states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It doesn’t take a constitutional law scholar to be able to read the First Amendment and know who it is restricting. But you do have to be literate.

Tocqueville on value of religion to society and government

“The reign of liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without beliefs.”

“Since religion has lost its sway over men’s soul, the most obvious boundary between good and evil has been overthrown; in the realm of morality, everything seems doubtful and uncertain: kings and nations go forward at random and no one can say where the natural limits of despotism and the boundaries of license are to be found.”

“When a nation’s religion is destroyed, doubt takes a grip upon the highest areas of intelligence, partially paralyzing all the others.  Each man gets used to having only confused and vacillating ideas on matters which have the greatest interest for himself and his fellows.  He puts up a poor defense of his opinions or abandons them and, as he despairs of ever resolving by himself the greatest problems presented by human destiny, he beats a cowardly retreat into not thinking at all.”

*Quotes from Tocqueville’s Democracy in America

Montesquieu quotes for today’s world

From Wikipedia:

“Charles de Secondat, baron de Montesquieu was a French social commentator and political thinker who lived during the Enlightenment. He is famous for his articulation of the theory of separation of powers, taken for granted in modern discussions of government and implemented in many constitutions throughout the world. He was largely responsible for the popularization of the terms feudalism and Byzantine Empire.”

His The Spirit of the Laws was a guide for our Founding Fathers when they wrote the Constitution.

In my book, The Path to Tyranny: A History of Free Society’s Descent into Tyranny, I frequently quote another influential Montesquieu book, Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline. I think you’ll enjoy these quotes, as they are just as relevant to today as they are to ancient Rome. I’ve added my own comments relating them to today’s situation.


“The government of Rome was admirable. From its birth, abuses of power could always be corrected by its constitution, whether by means of the spirit of the people, the strength of the senate, or the authority of certain magistrates.”

American’s Founding Fathers established the same balance of power between the people (House of Representatives), the more exclusive Senate (representing the states), and the President. It added even more checks and balances with the Supreme Court and federalist system, reserving most of the power to the people and states.


About Sulla: “The whim that made him give up the dictatorship seemed to restore life to the republic. But, in the frenzy of his successes, he had done things that made it impossible for Rome to preserve its liberty.”

Unfortunately, during wartime, and sometimes even without wars, the United States has given Presidents extraordinary powers to defend the country. Though this is done in the best interest of the republic, it often makes liberty more difficult to maintain. A great example of this is the Patriot Act. The theory behind the Patriot Act, to monitor and catch terrorists, is noble and worthwhile. However, the rights of all citizens are infringed upon by it (see the Know Your Customer rules for financial institutions).


Sulla “gave the lands of citizens to the soldiers, and made them forever greedy; from this moment onward, every warrior awaited an occasion that could place in his hands the property of his fellow citizens.”

Instead of giving to soldiers, the government today takes from the citizens and give to special interest groups. Unions, teachers, government employees, and welfare recipients receive from the government at the expense of private businesses and their employees. These takers have become greedy and government employees now receive higher pay and better benefits than those in the private sector.


“Just as the old Romans strengthened their empire by permitting every kind of religion in it, so was it subsequently reduced to nothing by amputating, one after the other, the sects which were not dominant.”

The United States was founding as a country tolerant to all religions. But in recent years, the government along with liberal groups such as the ACLU have been banning religion from government institutions. This would be of no concern had the government remained small. But with government everywhere, most especially in our schools, this ban on public religion has the effect of amputating all religions. What Rome did one religion at a time, the United States is doing all at once.


“Augustus (this is the name flattery gave Octavius) established order — that is, a durable servitude. For in a free state in which sovereignty has just been usurped, whatever can establish the unlimited authority of one man is called good order, and whatever can maintain the honest liberty of the subjects is called commotion, dissension, or bad government.”

Rome had experience a series of civil wars, first between Julius Caesar and the Senate led by Pompey, then between the republicans led by Cicero against the Second Triumvirate of Mark Antony, Octavian, and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, and finally between Mark Antony and Octavian. After years of unrest, all caused by the Roman’s desertion of their republican ways, they were happy to have order restored, even if it meant “a durable servitude” to a dictator.

This is the real reason so many today advocate anarchy and anti-globalization. They do not really want anarchy. Instead, they want to establish a situation which would call for immediate order, to be established by the government and “intellectual elites.” First stage is anarchy, second is totalitarianism. These “anarchists” hope they can direct events towards socialism, as they successfully did in Russia in the 1910s and attempted to do in Italy and Germany, though other collectivist regimes beat out the socialists and communists, though both the Fascists and Nazis adopted socialist platforms to win favor among the people.


“No tyranny is more cruel than the one practiced in the shadow of the laws and under color of justice — when, so to speak, one proceeds to drown the unfortunate on the very plank by which they had saved themselves. And since a tyrant never lacks instruments for his tyranny, Tiberius always found judges ready to condemn as many people as he might suspect.”

The American people are unlikely to put up with obvious and damaging law breaking by the President or other politicians. But they have the complexity of the law to hide behind. Most recently, President Obama has been accused of bribing potential congressional candidates not to run for office, a direct violation of the law. The administration does not deny that actions were taken to convince these people not to run for these offices, but hide in the complexity of the laws, arguing that no jobs were actually offered, only suggested, or that they were offered non-paying positions which are not real benefits. More damning has been the misuse of the IRS by numerous Presidents (FDR, JFK, Nixon, Clinton) to defend allies and attack enemies. In the United States, we do not tolerate outright tyranny, so the powerful do it in secret under the cover of the laws which they write and defend.


“A wise republic should hazard nothing that exposes it to either good or bad fortune. The only good to which it should aspire is the perpetuation of its condition… Rome was made for expansion, and its laws were admirable for this purpose… It lost its liberty because it completed the work it wrought too soon.”

The first and foremost goal of a republic is to maintain itself. A republic is of no use if it cannot survive. The United States has become a global policeman and source of funds for every country about to fail, even though the U.S. is deep in debt and running huge deficits. The United States can no longer afford overseas adventures (even if we could afford them, one could argue against them too). I never did understand the premise behind fighting the Spanish in the Philippines back in the Spanish-American War or the reasons for fighting in World War I. The primary goal of our republic should be to survive and protect our life, liberty, and property, not to bail out Greeks for spending more than they have or to defend Japan from North Korea (Japan can afford to do so for themselves).


“It is wearying, in the history of the emperors, to see the infinite number of men they put to death for the purpose of confiscating their wealth.”

Though emperors no longer execute the rich to steal their wealth, big government still verbally attacks the rich and threatens to throw them in jail (and has done so many times) if they do not give over a large portion of their wealth to the government, a small portion of which is given over to the needy while the vast majority goes to bureaucracy and graft.

Not only does the government “confiscate” much wealth through taxes, politicians shake down businesses for even more. With the power to shape legislation for or against them, businesses have little choice but to fork over billions of dollars to political campaigns, lobbyists, and friends and family members of politicians to avoid damaging legislation against them.


“Pursued by tax farmers, the citizens could do nothing but seek refuge among the barbarians or surrender their liberty to the first person who wanted to take it.”

The wealthy actively avoid taxes by setting up offshore accounts, moving overseas, and creating trusts. Unlike the Romans, who had no free societies to flee to, Americans can leave the United States and live in other free countries, taking their wealth with them. Unfortunately, this harms the United States. Hopefully, we will realize the harm we are doing to ourselves before all the wealthy flee, leaving the U.S. with a depleted capital base but enlarged welfare society.